Author: Rithik Ravindran
Topic: Chip Wars & TSMC
The world’s most renowned and advanced chipmaker, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC), is caught in the perilous crossfire of a revived U.S.–China tech rivalry under President Trump’s second term. Trump has intensified his “America First” semiconductor policy since his re-election in 2025, accusing Taiwan of “stealing America’s chip industry” and threatening punitive tariffs on imported chips. These hardline policies are reshaping TSMC’s strategy and Taiwan’s geopolitical calculus. TSMC’s responses – ranging from multibillion-dollar US investments to balancing between Washington and Beijing – demonstrate broader tectonic shifts in the global semiconductor industry.
Trump’s aggressive semiconductor tariffs, export restrictions, and industrial policies have propelled TSMC into a tense balancing act, dramatically reshaping global supply chains, intensifying the U.S.-China tech rivalry, and redefining Taiwan’s strategic position within this great-power struggle. Through his first term, Trump launched a trade and tech campaign that laid the groundwork for the chip wars of today.
From Trump 1.0 to Biden: Policy Foundations Shaping TSMC’s Path
His administration imposed sweeping tariffs on Chinese tech goods and wielded export controls to cut off China’s access to advanced semiconductors. A watershed came in 2020, when Washington barred TSMC from supplying Huawei – then one of TSMC’s largest customers – without a license, effectively severing Huawei’s chip lifeline. The Trump White House also pressured friends to exclude Chinese 5G and tightened scrutiny of Chinese investments in U.S. tech. These actions reinforced a view of chips as essential national security assets, and they jolted TSMC into rethinking its China exposure.
Indeed, by 2020 Trump officials had courted TSMC to build a U.S. fab, which culminated in TSMC’s 2020 announcement of a $12 billion Arizona plant. This first U.S. fab was intended to secure supply for America and represented the beginning of TSMC’s diversification outside Taiwan and China.
The Biden administration largely extended Trump’s hard line on Chinese technology, even tightening it
In October 2022, Biden introduced sweeping export controls that banned China from buying advanced chips and semiconductor equipment, with the aim of crippling Beijing’s AI and supercomputing abilities. Meanwhile, Biden was shifting away from Trump’s tariff-driven strategy to an incentive-driven industrial policy at home. In 2022, he signed the bipartisan CHIPS and Science Act – allocating $52.7 billion in subsidies and tax credits to onshore semiconductor manufacturing.
Biden’s Commerce Department leveraged this funding to induce “all five leading-edge global semiconductor companies” – including TSMC and Samsung – to build fabs in the United States. By 2024, TSMC’s Arizona fab was underway (pilot-producing 4 nm chips, assisted by approximately $6.6 billion in U.S. grants.
In short, Biden married Trump’s tech containment of China to robust support for allied chipmakers. This mix of sticks and carrots reinforced TSMC’s strategic shift: reducing reliance on China (TSMC stopped new China-bound advanced orders under U.S. rules) and expanding in the U.S., Japan, and other friendly locales.
By the start of Trump’s second term in 2025, TSMC had already built a foundation of investment and goodwill in America because of years of policy pushing by both Trump and Biden.
Trump’s Second Term: New Pressures and Policies on TSMC
Tariffs, Export Controls, and the Tech War 2.0
Trump’s return to office has ushered in a far more aggressive style of trade – even with Taiwan, an ally of the U.S. on security. He has threatened 25% tariffs on chips made overseas, naming Taiwan’s semiconductor exports. Trump threatened early in 2025 to impose tariffs on TSMC products as leverage to “bring the industry home.” The action, while unexpected by Taipei, fits his broader negotiating style: threaten with tariffs, then seek concessions or deals.
Trump’s administration also made clear it could replace Biden’s subsidies with tariffs as the primary way to strong-arm investment. Historical precedent looms; in the 1980s, punitive U.S. tariffs pressured Japan to move tech manufacturing to America. Now, Trump is subjecting Taiwan’s chip giants to the same pressure.
In the meantime, Washington is still using export controls to cripple China’s tech sector.
The expectation is a “harder stance toward China”, so the chip war will intensify. U.S. controls to date (under both Trump and Biden) have targeted mostly advanced 5 nm–7 nm chips and EUV lithography. Second-term Trump officials are weighing whether to extend controls to older nodes or more Chinese entities.
Any tightening directly affects TSMC’s China business. TSMC already is barred from shipping its newest chips to Chinese clients without U.S. approval; pending rules could restrict even 28 nm or mature-node sales, further squeezing TSMC’s Chinese client base. Yet U.S. export bans also lock Chinese players out of the cutting-edge, preserving TSMC’s tech lead.
Trump 2.0 is essentially doubling down on a policy of containment that keeps TSMC safe from Chinese competition (i.e., SMIC catching up) while squarely putting TSMC on Team USA. Trump’s Commerce Secretary matter-of-factly noted that TSMC and others are investing in America “as they sought to avoid Trump’s new tariffs” – a carrot-and-stick dynamic defining the new tech war.
AI and Tech Policy Shifts Affecting Chipmakers
High-tech policy in Trump’s second term is laser-focused on AI leadership and supply chain security, which places TSMC at the center of U.S. strategic planning. Trump has installed tech hawks (even an “AI and crypto czar”) to ensure American dominance in frontier technologies. A primary concern is that America’s AI revolution – from bleeding-edge GPUs to cloud chips – depends on silicon made by TSMC.
As of 2024, TSMC manufactured over 90% of the world’s most advanced AI chips, including the newest processors powering everything from smartphones to military systems. This reality has driven U.S. policy to secure those chip supply chains. Trump’s administration has said that AI chips must be “Made in USA” or at least assembled there, to eliminate vulnerabilities.
In practical terms, Trump’s tech policies have two facets for TSMC:
- Ensuring U.S. access to the finest chips for AI and defense by bringing more of TSMC’s production and packaging to America.
- Denying the same chips to China.
The U.S. restricted exports of AI accelerators to China late in 2024, a setback that was aimed at China’s AI ambitions but also made TSMC lose some orders that were destined for Chinese companies. Trump seems likely to maintain or tighten these AI chip bans.
The result is that TSMC must carefully balance capacity between China and the West: booming demand from U.S. clients like NVIDIA and Apple on one side, versus minimal (and tightly controlled) sales to China on the other.
Any AI policy shocks – e.g., a U.S. ban on all advanced chip sales to Chinese clients – would push TSMC to devote even more resources to U.S. and allied markets.
In a nutshell, Trump’s AI policy prioritizes domestic chip self-sufficiency, indirectly making TSMC’s advanced fabs a component of the U.S. innovation ecosystem.
U.S.–Taiwan Relations: Defense, Trade, and “Transactional” Support
Despite Trump’s trade-bashing rhetoric, Taiwan is a key U.S. partner – but Trump has turned the relationship sharply transactional. He has explicitly demanded that Taiwan “pay for protection” and drastically raise defense spending to 10% of GDP. These demands have unnerved Taipei, which has already raised its defense budget to record levels (though still roughly 2.5% of GDP.
Taiwanese officials were offended by Trump’s implication that Taiwan “doesn’t give us anything,” noting its semiconductor prowess was locally developed and benefits both economies. Nonetheless, Trump’s tough love has nudged Taiwan’s government to show acquiescence where it may. President Lai Ching-te’s government quickly congratulated Trump for his re-election and reaffirmed the “long-standing partnership founded on common values” – an olive branch amid the tension.
On trade, Trump’s approach is different from Biden’s multilateralism. Rather than building on the first U.S.–Taiwan 21st Century Trade Initiative launched in 2022, Trump has proposed bilateral deals if Taiwan meets U.S. conditions. One condition, although unstated, is semiconductors.
Trump’s statements tying trade to chip production – effectively saying give us fabs and we’ll offer you free trade – have put Taipei in a difficult position. Taiwan’s government is only too aware that its economy is very dependent on electronics exports (over 15% of GDP comes from semiconductors). They are thus attempting to appease Trump by accelerating tech investment in America
At the same time, they must reassure the Taiwanese that they are not simply capitulating. This fragile equilibrium defines U.S.–Taiwan relations in the Trump 2.0 era: close strategic coordination against China, coupled with hard-nosed deal-making on trade issues.
For TSMC, which generates approximately 70% of its revenues from North America, remaining in the good books of the Trump White House is vital – otherwise, it could face “greater regulatory risk” or politicized backlash from Washington.
TSMC has been made into both a linchpin and a pressure point in U.S.–Taiwan relations, with Trump leveraging America’s security umbrella to obtain economic concessions.
Repatriating Chip Manufacturing: From CHIPS Act to “Tariff Act”
Trump’s second term is reshaping U.S. industrial policy for semiconductors. While Biden favored subsidies (the CHIPS Act grants) to attract chipmakers, Trump has been more inclined to renegotiate or eliminate those subsidies in favor of market “tough love.” He has pledged to review CHIPS Act funding and even wondered aloud about eliminating it e
The CHIPS Act is a “terrible, terrible thing… You should get rid of it,” Trump told Congress, grumbling that firms took U.S. money without providing proportionate benefit. Trump instead believes tax cuts and tariffs will achieve the desired outcome – firms building in the U.S. to avoid import taxes, without huge government spending
The philosophical shift has tangible consequences for TSMC. Under Biden, TSMC was pledged $6.6 billion in grants for its Arizona fabs. Through early 2025, it had gotten $1.5 billion of that. Now Trump’s review jeopardizes the rest of the funding, possibly delaying or reducing what’s left. Indeed, Trump publicly scolded the Biden-era subsidies to TSMC and said he was weighing whether to hold back grant payments. TSMC suddenly finds itself in doubt over incentives pledged to it, even as it’s being encouraged to expand more.
Rather than subsidies, Trump’s administration is wielding the stick. By imposing (or threatening) 25% tariffs on chips, they are making it costlier to import semiconductors from Taiwan – thus incentivizing TSMC to manufacture locally.
The strategy appears to be working: in March 2025, TSMC CEO C.C. Wei appeared alongside Trump at the White House to announce a huge $100 billion U.S. investment plan. It involves five new buildings: three additional fabs, along with two advanced packaging plants and a new R&D building
Trump hailed it as proof that “we must make the chips we need right here… It’s a matter of national security”.As a quid pro quo, he essentially promised TSMC tariff relief: “By doing it here, [TSMC] has no tariffs,” Trump said, describing how his tariff threats were the immediate incentive for the company’s investment.
That is, Trump traded tariff exemptions for concrete investment on US soil – the reverse of Biden’s cash subsidy strategy.
Trump’s repatriation push extends beyond TSMC to envelop Intel and other US companies. A prime objective is to “rescue” Intel’s floundering foundry business and win America a native leading-edge fab.
Reports even indicated the White House floated a landmark deal: TSMC investing in Intel’s foundry business (Intel Foundry Services) or a joint venture, effectively transplanting TSMC’s expertise to revive Intel.
The deal on offer would cut out Intel’s fab business with TSMC in control – a partnership aimed at rapidly scaling up U.S. production capacity. However, such a tie-up raises prickly questions. TSMC would have to balance basically incompatible process technologies and corporate cultures, and it would take the risk of exposing its crown-jewel IP to a potential rival (Intel).
Taiwanese authorities are reportedly worried: Taipei would not look kindly on any coerced tech transfer undermining Taiwan’s strategic edge. For now, then, the TSMC-Intel mega-deal seems improbable – Trump himself is said to be displeased at the prospect of a “foreign” company running a U.S. champion.
Instead, more tangible steps are moving ahead: TSMC is designing a new Arizona advanced packaging plant (for CoWoS technology critical to AI chips) wh, which is also considering and accelerating construction of its 2nd and 3rd Arizona fabs (for 3 nm and 2 nm nodes) by as much as one year. These moves are part of Trump’s vision of a completely onshore supply chain – from wafer fab to chip packaging – even if realized through TSMC expansion rather than Intel revival.
Above all, Trump’s policies offer a double-edged sword to TSMC. On the one hand, tariff pressures are forcing expensive d, duplicative investments. TSMC’s U.S. operations are more expensive and have been slowed by workforce and culture problems. Margins would be diluted as TSMC grows in Arizona.
On the other hand, being in Trump’s good books shields TSMC from worse punishments – like steep import tariffs on its chips or regulatory attacks. TSMC has been able to pass on most of the tariff costs to U.S. customers so far because of its market leadership position (After all, if Apple and NVIDIA have no alternative source of TSMC’s 3 nm chips, they will pony up.)
This pricing power only goes so far, however. TSMC’s smaller Taiwanese competitors with lower margins could be injured if component tariffs sweep their products. That is why Taiwan’s industry as a whole is now petitioning Washington. Analysts note that Taiwanese firms lack Intel’s Beltway clout, and they are scrambling to set up and shore up their U.S. lobbying
Trump’s repatriation drive is recalibrating incentives overall: fewer free dollars, more “tough” dollars, and a rebalancing of the competitive playing field in favor of investors in America. TSMC, reading the writing on the wall, is betting $100 billion that it’s better to be a Trump America partner than a target.
Geopolitical Ripple Effects on Taiwan and the Tech Balance
Taiwan’s Silicon Shield
Twenty years back, Taiwan treated its semiconductor leadership as a geopolitical cushion, the so-called “silicon shield.” The theory is that Taiwan’s position as a vital chip supplier deters China from invading and assures American protection, since war would disrupt the worldwide technology ecosystem
TSMC is the foundation of that shield, producing 60% of the world’s semiconductors and over 90% of advanced chips. Trump policies are now testing the integrity of this silicon shield. By luring some of Taiwan’s offshore chip production to the U.S., Trump theoretically reduces the world’s over-reliance on the island’s fabs. U.S. policymakers like Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo had warned that 90% dependence on Taiwan for advanced chips was an unacceptable vulnerability.
From Washington’s perspective, getting fabs to Arizona and elsewhere provides insurance in the event of a Taiwan Strait crisis. Actually, some in Taipei see the $100 billion U.S. chip commitment as “an insurance policy for [Taiwan’s] security” – a way of further anchoring the U.S. in Taiwan’s fate. Without U.S. security guarantees, there is no shield, as one Taiwanese strategist put it, so it is important to keep the Americans invested (both literally and figuratively)
Many in Taiwan, however, fear Trump’s approach and the dangers of draining the shield. Opposition legislators have lambasted President Lai for “selling TSMC to Trump” and risking a “grave national security crisis”.
If too much of TSMC’s cutting-edge capacity is exported, Taiwan risks losing the same leverage that saved it. As KMT lawmaker Fu Kun-chi pointedly asked, “If TSMC is to become the ‘American Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’, where will Taiwan’s security be then? “ The former President Ma Ying-jeou accused the government of gambling with Taiwan’s advantage, reducing the island from a strategic “pawn” to a “discarded piece” of great-power competition.
The Lai administration has also taken great pains to allay these fears. Within hours of the White House announcement, TSMC’s CEO flew back to Taipei to stand alongside President Lai and solemnly pledge that “the company’s most advanced semiconductor technologies would remain in Taiwan.”. The Presidential Office once again stated that any TSMC expansion must be screened by the government and that Taiwan will “ensure its most advanced tech does not leave the island.”
In practical terms, this means that Taiwan is going to retain the bleeding-edge node development on the island (i.e., 2 nm and smaller), even as 4 nm and older processes are replicated in America.
How this plays out will determine if the silicon shield remains plausible. On one hand, collective security can be strengthened by co-production – the U.S. will be all the more determined to defend a partner that co-produces vital chips.
On the other hand, if the perception of Taiwan’s indispensability fades, there is a risk (perhaps overstated) that the U.S. will be less willing to go to war with China over Taiwan’s fate. Taiwanese economists note that onshoring chips cuts U.S. reliance on Taiwan, so Taiwan’s priority is to ensure its role doesn’t disappear – or U.S. willingness to defend it may decrease.
This delicate calculus is not lost on Lai’s government. Taiwan is increasing defense spending and arms procurement to show it is not a free-rider on U.S. protection
And in embracing tighter economic ties with America, the authorities are keen to present TSMC’s US investment as win-win, generating supply chain resilience “with our partners & a stronger Taiwan–US partnership” rather than a zero-sum drain. In effect, Taiwan is trying to turn the script from “silicon shield shattered” to “silicon shield shared.” The coming years will be a test of whether that semantic rewriting has substance – especially if cross-Strait tensions escalate.
Backlash from Beijing: “Hollowing Out” Taiwan
China has reacted with its usual outrage at Trump’s Taiwan policies and TSMC’s central position in the U.S. tech arsenal. Beijing considers Washington’s courtship of TSMC as part of a strategy to “tighten its grip, hollowing out TSMC and draining Taiwan”, according to China’s Taiwan Affairs Office.
In a March 2025 press conference, a Chinese government spokesperson lambasted Taiwanese leaders for “shamelessly selling out Taiwan” with massive tech transfers to the U.S., calling it an attempt to “rely on the U.S. to seek independence.”
Chinese state media now sarcastically refers to TSMC as “USMC” (United States/Taiwan Semiconductor) and warns that Taiwan will be a hollow shell after America sucks out its tech industry. In Beijing’s narrative, Taiwan’s destiny of being transformed from a ‘pawn’ to a ‘discarded piece’ is sealed, meaning China believes America will discard Taiwan once it is no longer needed.
Beyond rhetoric, China is ramping up on multiple fronts: pressuring Taiwan diplomatically, reacting to U.S. trade moves, and doubling down on becoming self-reliant in semiconductors. Beijing reacted soon after Trump’s tariff and TSMC announcements with moves such as initiating an antitrust investigation into U.S. tech firms (e.g., Google) – a shot across the bow that U.S. firms can suffer in China’s market
China’s leaders also emphasize that cross-Strait trade remains massive (nearly $293 billion in 2024). They fault Taiwan’s ruling party (the DPP) for trying to “decouple” from the mainland, charging that such a move is economically illogical and “doomed to fail”. Certainly, hundreds of Taiwanese tech firms have plants in China; Beijing could in theory leverage that interdependence to sanction Taiwan’s economy if tensions worsen.
However, China must be careful – any drastic measure (e.g., stopping rare earth exports or shutting off Apple’s China sales) would run the risk of backfiring and accelerating the U.S.-led decoupling that China fears most.
Above all, China is racing to build its own TSMC. U.S. bans have only redoubled China’s efforts to invest hundreds of billions of dollars in domestic chip talent (under plans like “Made in China 2025” and beyond). Chinese foundries lag by years so far – SMIC, for example, is roughly at 14 nm technology, a long way from TSMC’s 3 nm. That said, Chinese engineers are trying to catch up, and China is actively recruiting semiconductor talent (including from TSMC’s own Taiwan ranks).
TSMC therefore has a long-term competitive risk: though U.S. policy protects it in the short term, a more technologically independent China may try to gradually eat away at TSMC’s huge China market (which was about 10–20% of revenue before 2020). Additionally, in the event of conflict, Beijing might try to target TSMC plants with cyber attacks or coercion to deter U.S. involvement.
Chinese official media publicly argue that TSMC’s American expansion is undermining Taiwan’s security and economy, indicating that Beijing is happy that Taiwan’s reliance on America has negative consequences. This kind of propaganda can be designed to influence Taiwan’s 2028 elections, favoring politicians who lean towards accommodation with China instead of further reliance on America.
In sum, Trump’s policies have turned semiconductors into a geopolitical battleground. Taiwan is caught in the middle, and China is responding by militarily and economically turning up the pressure while accelerating its efforts to end Western tech dependence.
TSMC’s status as the indispensable chip provider is exactly what China ultimately wants to eliminate, but until it does, that status also limits Beijing. As long as China’s economy “relies heavily on imports of advanced semiconductors from Taiwan,” Beijing has a stake in not waging a war that would destroy TSMC’s fabs.
It’s a paradox: TSMC is simultaneously a target in the tech war and an implicit guarantor of (relative) peace. Trump’s open backing for Taiwan, together with his efforts to mirror some of TSMC’s ability in America, is provoking China – yet even China must calculate the cataclysmic costs of doing anything at all on the “sacred mountain” of TSMC.
TSMC’s Tightrope: Balancing U.S. and Chinese Demands
TSMC is treading carefully in this charged environment. The company’s strategy to date has been one of practical accommodation and diversification. With the U.S. now accounting for 70% of its revenue, TSMC cannot risk defying Washington’s dictates.
It has therefore eagerly followed U.S. export bans (cutting off Chinese clients like Huawei), expanded operations in America and Japan, and even engaged in backroom lobbying to shape U.S. policy
All the while, TSMC must also guarantee Taiwan and investors that it is not any longer simply transforming into an American subsidiary. The company has committed to keeping its R&D center in Taiwan, knowing that its “competitive edge depends on technology leadership and R&D based [at home]”.
It also knows that giving up its most advanced know-how – whether to the U.S. or to anyone else – would compromise its leadership. TSMC has thus adamantly resisted any agreement that has even a hint of a forced tech transfer.
Rumors that Trump wanted TSMC to either share advanced processes with Intel or open a 2 nm fab in the U.S. were met with a stark warning: TSMC’s track record shows it “has been extremely careful about sharing its technology, especially with key competitors,” and Taiwan’s government would likely prevent moves that erode the island’s strategic tech advantage.
TSMC’s current approach is to split the difference – satisfy U.S. hunger by localizing some of the capacity, but retain the crown jewels in Hsinchu. It is, in effect, creating a two-tiered production strategy: bleeding-edge (N3, N2, etc.) stays in Taiwan for the most part, but one-generation-earlier fabs (N4/N5) and advanced packaging can be duplicated in the U.S. and Japan
In taking this action, TSMC tries to address U.S. insistence on supply chain security without completely “giving away the store.” So far, this plan has agreement on both sides – the U.S. gets the high-end production on its soil, and Taiwan’s leaders can say the most sensitive technology isn’t being sent out.
The challenge will be if Trump (or a future U.S. administration) insists that everything must be made in America. For example, if Washington someday orders that 2 nm chips for defense must be manufactured in the U.S., TSMC would be forced into an unpleasant choice, even a national security dilemma for Taiwan. But short of that extremity, TSMC will likely continue to thread the needle, expanding abroad while keeping its innovation engine in Taiwan.
Financially and operationally, such global juggling is challenging. TSMC must deal with higher costs, labor shortages, and cultural adjustment in Arizona.
Ramp-up at the initial U.S. fab has been slower than anticipated – full production was pushed from 2024 to 2025 due to training and turnover issues. But TSMC also knows that the “optics” of job creation in the U.S. are extremely important to Trump
The company has thus taken pains to smooth out these challenges: it is working closely with U.S. partners (and even outsourcing to local firms like Amkor for some packaging operations), and it is adapting management practices to help make American engineers feel more included.
TSMC also expects U.S. tax credits (since Trump favors tax credits over direct subsidies) to recover some costs
Meanwhile, to keep its efficiency, TSMC continues to invest heavily in its Taiwan mega-fabs – plans for a 2 nm fab cluster in Taiwan are underway full steam with government support.
In effect, TSMC is building a scattered empire: Taiwan remains the technological heart and volume center, the U.S. is a high-visibility second center, and Japan (with a new fab for specialty chips) – and possibly Europe (in talks for a fab in Germany) – fill niche needs
The diversification also reduces the existential risk that hangs over the company: a war in the Taiwan Strait. By establishing capacity offshore, TSMC increases the likelihood it would be capable of continuing to operate (at least partially) in the event of a crisis – a type of corporate insurance policy against geopolitical shock.
TSMC and the Indo-Pacific Tech Alliance
TSMC’s trajectory is also cementing a broader coalition of democracies in technology. The U.S., Taiwan, Japan, South Korea, and Europe are now coordinating more to render semiconductor supply chains secure among themselves and exclude China from critical domains.
There were even talks under Biden of a “Chip 4” alliance (US–Taiwan–Japan–Korea) to formalize this cooperation. Under Trump, these multilateral arrangements are less apparent, but the outcomes are identical: Japan has imposed export controls on chip equipment (in coordination with U.S. policy to deny China tools), the Netherlands has restricted sales of advanced lithography to China, and Japan and Europe have welcomed TSMC investments on their soil with generous incentives.
For instance, TSMC’s joint venture in Japan (JASM) – sponsored by Sony and the Japanese government – will produce 7 nm and 28 nm chips, serving Japan’s auto industry and cementing a tech alliance
Similarly, a planned fab in Germany (European Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., or ESMC) – with partners including Infineon and Bosch – will focus on specialty chips for Europe’s market. These steps are consistent with U.S. strategy: with TSMC capacity in several friendly locations, the allied network is more resilient, and China’s leverage is reduced.
TSMC itself is coming to be regarded by U.S. authorities increasingly as a national security cornerstone: the virtual adjunct to the defense industrial base. US military systems rely on TSMC-made chips (e.g., chips in F-35 fighters and advanced AI systems for intelligence).
This has led Washington to contemplate drastic measures: some reports suggest the U.S. has evacuation or “scorched earth” plans for TSMC in case of invasion, to keep its technology out of Chinese hands. Such possibilities are extreme (and not officially confirmed), but they speak to TSMC’s perceived strategic significance.
It’s no accident that Trump’s announcement of TSMC’s $100 billion U.S. expansion featured his new “AI czar” and Commerce Secretary flanking TSMC’s CEO on either side – reflecting just how closely U.S. tech ambitions (AI) and economic security are intertwined with TSMC.
Additionally, TSMC’s situation has turned into a case study for allies such as South Korea. Seoul watches carefully how Trump deals with TSMC, because Samsung is exposed to the same pressures. Trump has not spared allies from his tariff barrage – he has made it clear that no one is excluded from the global tariff battle, not even Japan or Korea.
Indeed, if TSMC had resisted Trump’s demands, there was speculation he would have slapped tariffs on all imported chips, which would also have impacted Samsung’s exports. In that sense, TSMC’s compliance perhaps averted a wider trade war that would have hurt other allies. Now Samsung is also putting more investment into its Texas fab expansion, and Intel (despite being U.S.-based) is lobbying hard to ensure it gets a large portion in any U.S. semiconductor strategy.
All of these moves are suggestive of a fragmenting global industry: one bloc led by the U.S. and supplied by TSMC/Samsung, another led by China trying to catch up via state sponsorship. Geopolitics increasingly dictates where and how chips are made, something TSMC has no choice but to take in its stride.
A Precarious Equilibrium
As the semiconductor world is reshaped by President Trump’s second-term policies, TSMC is both a beneficiary and a barometer of the broader geopolitical shift.
On the one hand, Trump’s hard-nosed stance – tariffs, onshoring demands, and techno-nationalism – has compelled TSMC into a record-breaking expansion, effectively making it a bi-continental company and further tying it with the U.S. economy. In the near term, this enhances U.S. supply chain security and reinforces the tech alliance against China.
Yet, the triumph of Trump’s pressure also begets longer-term risks: the potential erosion of Taiwan’s value proposition, strife with Taiwan’s society and other allies, and greater belligerence from Beijing.
TSMC’s fate now commingles with high-risk geopolitics. The company must tread a fine line – satisfy U.S. strategic needs without undermining the Taiwanese foundation underpinning its innovation. Thus far, TSMC and the Taiwanese government appear set to tread this tightrope, keeping bleeding-edge R&D onshore and sending the products of it overseas, in the hopes of preserving the “silicon shield” even as they belt it with American steel.
The policy implications for Taiwan are profound. Taipei will need to accelerate military and economic reforms to improve its credibility in the eyes of Trump – increasing defense expenditures (although 10% of GDP is not feasible) and demonstrating that it is “willing to pay its share financially to Washington’s support” It will also need to diversify its economy beyond semiconductors (which employ roughly only 3% of its workers despite 15% of GDP), so that Trump’s ire at the chip trade imbalance does not expand into broader punitive measures.
For the global semiconductor industry, Trump’s re-election solidifies a trend for government policy to pull key manufacturing onto national or friendly territory, at some cost of efficiency. It may mean higher cost and duplicate capacity, but also more resilient supply chains insulated from geopolitical disruption. TSMC and others will accept short-term pain to build longer-term strength – in essence, an insurance premium for stability.
Expert opinion is that Trump’s hardball is risky, but also reflects the fact that tech supply chains can no longer be purely commercial. Semiconductors are a strategic resource, and nations will battle for control. TSMC’s case shows both the promise and pitfalls of this brave new world.
The U.S. and Taiwan, by delicate negotiation, have thus far reached a formula of mutual benefit: America receives jobs and security, Taiwan receives a more profound security commitment (and retains its R&D advantage), and TSMC receives political backing in its largest market. Tho gh, the balance is precarious. If Trump’s requirements escalate above Taiwan’s or TSMC’s patience – or Beijing concludes time is no longer on its side – things could fall apart, with TSMC squarely in the fault line.
For now, TSMC remains the world’s most vital chipmaker, adapting to survive and thrive under Trump 2.0.
Its fate will have consequences not just for corporate fortunes but for the balance of geopolitical power in the Indo-Pacific. Under the shadow of great power rivalry, TSMC is no longer just a company; it is a geostrategic asset. And, as this case study shows, when geopolitics and technology converge, even a company in its prime must continually adjust to new political realities on the ground.
The coming years will see whether Trump’s hardline policies ultimately solidify America’s chip supremacy with TSMC’s help – or whether they unintentionally accelerate the very fragmentation of the global semiconductor supply chain that TSMC stitched together in recent decades. Whatever the case, the implications for Taiwan’s security and the future of the semiconductor industry will be profound, making TSMC’s tale a model of 21st-century business and statecraft.
References
Brookings Institution. (2025, January). Taiwan President Lai’s three big challenges in 2025. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/taiwan-president-lais-three-big-challenges-in-2025/
CSIS. (n.d.). Silicon island: Assessing Taiwan’s importance to U.S. economic growth and security. https://www.csis.org/analysis/silicon-island-assessing-taiwans-importance-us-economic-growth-and-security
DSET. (2025). DSET op-ed on The Diplomat analyzes Trump’s semiconductor policy and its implications for Taiwan. https://dset.tw/en/media-report-en/dset-op-ed-on-the-diplomat-analyzes-trumps-semiconductor-policy-and-its-implications-for-taiwan/
Economist. (2024, November 20). New fronts will open up in the chip wars in 2025. https://www.economist.com/the-world-ahead/2024/11/20/new-fronts-will-open-up-in-the-chip-wars-in-2025
Foreign Policy. (2025, February 24). Taiwan, TSMC, Trump, and the chip wars. https://foreignpolicy.com/2025/02/24/taiwan-tsmc-trump-semiconductors-chips-technology-intel/
Global Times. (2025, March). In an attempt to rely on the U.S. to seek independence, Taiwan risks hollowing out its chip industry. https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202503/1329959.shtml
Global Taiwan Institute. (2025, January). How should Taiwan brace for Trump’s second term? https://globaltaiwan.org/2025/01/how-should-taiwan-brace-for-trumps-second-term/
Inkl. (2025). Taiwan downplays national security concerns after Trump and TSMC’s $100bn semiconductor deal. https://www.inkl.com/news/taiwan-downplays-national-security-concerns-after-trump-and-tsmc-s-100bn-semiconductor-deal
JoongAng Daily. (2025, February 3). Korea potentially a prime target in Trump’s global tariff war. https://koreajoongangdaily.joins.com/news/2025-02-03/national/diplomacy/Korea-potentially-a-prime-target-in-Trumps-global-tariff-war/2233928
Reuters. (2020, May 19). TSMC ends Huawei orders: Report. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/biz/archives/2020/05/19/2003736638
Reuters. (2025, March 3). TSMC CEO to meet with Trump, tout investment plans. https://www.reuters.com/technology/tsmc-ceo-meet-with-trump-tout-investment-plans-2025-03-03/
Reuters. (2020, May 15). TSMC stops new Huawei orders after U.S. restrictions—Nikkei. https://www.reuters.com/article/business/tsmc-stops-new-huawei-orders-after-us-restrictions-nikkei-idUSKBN22U0IS/
Taipei Times. (2020, May 19). TSMC ends Huawei orders: Report. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/biz/archives/2020/05/19/2003736638
The Diplomat. (2025, January). Carrots and sticks: Taiwan and semiconductor supply chains under Trump 2.0. https://thediplomat.com/2025/01/carrots-and-sticks-taiwan-and-semiconductor-supply-chains-under-trump-2-0/
WUNC. (2025, March 12). Taiwanese chip giant’s investments in U.S. stir ‘silicon shield’ security worries. https://www.wunc.org/2025-03-12/taiwanese-chip-giants-investments-in-u-s-stir-silicon-shield-security-worries